Congo was Belgian, read a little history.
The Martians told her that they tasted just like squirrel.
The British had no involvement with the Congo, yet another clueless post.
and americans wonder why we laugh at their education System
That was Leopold of Belgium, ably assisted by Henry Morton Stanley, the American journalist who had found Dr. Livingstone earlier.
Queen Victoria didnt kill anyone... i think you might have to look at Belgium who were the colonial power that governed congo
Scraping the barrel of non-history again. You really are a credit to your family, no wonder you hide your identity.
fear & ignorance
She didn't, because her Empire didn't own the Congo and had nothing to do with it. Congo was a Belgian possession.
Congo wasn't a British colony.
History/Geography - FAIL
Id say she was not discriminating, she had people killed all over Africa, and most of the rest of the world too. the reason was the acquisition of wealth, and power.
The Belgians, not the British, colonised the Congo.
Is your ignorance real or feigned?
No, she did not
I think killing was maybe not much what they'd do, because the purpose of colonisation was to trade, and capitalism. But I think you are confused because Congo is a french-speaking country as it was a Belgian colony.
She didn't. Why do you keep posting these silly questions?
No, Queen Victoria did not go to the Congo Free State for exploitation at the time. It was Leopold II of Belgium who brutally treated the native people as sub-human slaves and made them work on the plantations.
Impossible, she never went to the Congo.
She never went there
She momentarily thought she was king of the Belgians?
As she never went outside Europe, I think someone is pulling your leg.
From the amount of posting this person does, I think they are mad that their country left the British Comonwealth and misses the British Empire.
LOL. That was not Queen Victoria, that was Leopold II of Belgium.